Viewpoint: Is it time to call time on reaction time?

With the increase in the usage of millisecond reaction time based testing this article critically evaluates the thinking behind reaction time testing, concluding that stronger definitions of what is being measured are needed and more clarity in the terminology surrounding the conscious / unconscious distinction.

Twenty years ago, while in the middle of my PhD on implicit testing and advertising, I read an academic paper describing a variation on using millisecond reaction time (RT) to reveal unconscious biases. A few years later, the paper describing the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (Greenwald et al 1998) was highlighted in Malcolm Gladwell's (2005). book Blink.This prompted many research companies to start investigating RT based testing. I myself began using RT for brand testing around 2003 (probably the first to do this). Fifteen years on though, it's time to ask how useful actually is RT data?...

Not a subscriber?

Schedule your live demo with our team today

WARC helps you to plan, create and deliver more effective marketing

  • Prove your case and back-up your idea

  • Get expert guidance on strategic challenges

  • Tackle current and emerging marketing themes

We’re long-term subscribers to WARC and it’s a tool we use extensively. We use it to source case studies and best practice for the purposes of internal training, as well as for putting persuasive cases to clients. In compiling a recent case for long-term, sustained investment in brand, we were able to support key marketing principles with numerous case studies sourced from WARC. It helped bring what could have been a relatively dry deck to life with recognisable brand successes from across a broad number of categories. It’s incredibly efficient to have such a wealth of insight in one place.

Insights Team
Bray Leino

You’re in good company

We work with 80% of Forbes' most valuable brands* and 80% of the world's top top-of-the-class agencies.

* Top 10 brands